Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Steve Clemons interviews Eli Pariser

Former Executive Director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser discusses his new book "The Filter Bubble" and how the architecture of the internet is evolving to match our interests and filtering out information that might challenge our opinions.

Steve Clemons on Obama's Approach to Libya

Steve Clemons argues that in addittion to being ineffectual militarily, a no-fly zone will change the narrative of the Libyan uprising and shift the focus from the decisions of the Libyan rebels to the actions of Western nations.

Ian Bremmer On the War Between States and Corporations

Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer discusses the political and economic impacts of the economic recession, as well as rising economic powers.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page

The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

At Current Trends, the Republican Party Won't Have Any Republicans. . .

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Tuesday, Jan 16 2007, 3:32PM

william f. buckley.jpg

. . .or real ones anyway.

Senator Chuck Hagel is a real Republican. So is former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft. I know darn well how hard core a Republican Nixon Center President Dimitri Simes is. Former Senator Alan Simpson might be a true artist at making Democrats feel at home around him, but he's a hard core Republican -- or was until recently perhaps.

George Will's Republicanism has already been designated "high crimes insubordination" by some in the White House.

But now, the hardest of the hard William F. Buckley -- founding editor of National Review -- is on his way off of the President's Christmas Card list.

In a sober piece, titled "Yes or No to Bush?", the conservative scion Buckley salutes and says "see you later, George."

Here is the kicker:

A geographical division of Iraq is inevitable. The major players are obvious. It isn't plain how America, as an outside party, could play an effective role, let alone one that was decisive, in that national redefinition. And America would do well to encourage non-American agents to act as brokers -- people with names like Ban Ki-moon.

On the basis of this analysis I will vote against supplementary American involvement in Iraq.

Ban Ki-moon is speaking today at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Despite Buckley's sound thinking on Iraq opposing escalation, it is also fascinating to see National Review mention the United Nations in a slightly positive tone.

More soon.

-- Steve Clemons



« Previous Article - Iraq's Foreign Minister Confirms Diplomatic Mission of Detained Iranians
» Next Article - America's Transition from Global Dominant Superpower to a "Normal" Great Power

Reader Comments (9) - post a comment

Posted by Cambell, Jan 16 2007, 3:51PM - Link

Campbell
Does the claimed King of the World's ' War Criminals ' GWB really dictate world's affairs? Is April the designated date for the invasion of Iran? As some pundits claim to be the case.. American madness at it's best.
Bush's own convention rules. Those labelled as enemy combatants, being held at Guantamano Bay are not covered by the Geneva Convention, and they claim totalitarism was practiced by Russia, in the cold war era.

"He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it" - Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968), US civil rights leader

"The time has come for America to hear the truth about this tragic war. In international conflicts, the truth is hard to come by because most nations are deceived about themselves. Rationalizations and the incessant search for scapegoats are the psychological cataracts that blind us to our sins. But the day has passed for superficial patriotism. He who lives with untruth lives in spiritual slavery." - Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968), US civil rights
PART II Geneva Convention

GENERAL PROTECTION OF PRISONERS OF WAR

Article 12

Prisoners of war are in the hands of the enemy Power, but not of the individuals or military units who have captured them. Irrespective of the individual responsibilities that may exist, the Detaining Power is responsible for the treatment given them.

Prisoners of war may only be transferred by the Detaining Power to a Power which is a party to the Convention and after the Detaining Power has satisfied itself of the willingness and ability of such transferee Power to apply the Convention. When prisoners of war are transferred under such circumstances, responsibility for the application of the Convention rests on the Power accepting them while they are in its custody.

Nevertheless if that Power fails to carry out the provisions of the Convention in any important respect, the Power by whom the prisoners of war were transferred shall, upon being notified by the Protecting Power, take effective measures to correct the situation or shall request the return of the prisoners of war. Such requests must be complied with.

Article 13

Prisoners of war must at all times be humanely treated. Any unlawful act or omission by the Detaining Power causing death or seriously endangering the health of a prisoner of war in its custody is prohibited, and will be regarded as a serious breach of the present Convention. In particular, no prisoner of war may be subjected to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are not justified by the medical, dental or hospital treatment of the prisoner concerned and carried out in his interest.

Likewise, prisoners of war must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity.

Measures of reprisal against prisoners of war are prohibited.

Article 14

Prisoners of war are entitled in all circumstances to respect for their persons and their honour. Women shall be treated with all the regard due to their sex and shall in all cases benefit by treatment as favourable as that granted to men. Prisoners of war shall retain the full civil capacity which they enjoyed at the time of their capture. The Detaining Power may not restrict the exercise, either within or without its own territory, of the rights such capacity confers except in so far as the captivity requires.

Article 15

The Power detaining prisoners of war shall be bound to provide free of charge for their maintenance and for the medical attention required by their state of health.

Article 16

Taking into consideration the provisions of the present Convention relating to rank and sex, and subject to any privileged treatment which may be accorded to them by reason of their state of health, age or professional qualifications, all prisoners of war shall be treated alike by the Detaining Power, without any adverse distinction based on race, nationality, religious belief or political opinions, or any other distinction founded on similar criteria

Posted by Larry H, Jan 16 2007, 3:54PM - Link

'Real' Republicans, 'Fake' Republicans, 'Real' Democrats, 'Fake' Democrats, it does not matter. Unfortunately it took segregationist Governor Wallace to reveal the truth that "there's not a dime's worth of difference between" Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats willingly went along with the War in Iraq, suspension of Habeas Corpus, detaining protesters, opening mail, banning books like "America Deceived' from Amazon, stealing private lands (Kelo decision), warrant-less wiretapping and refusing to investigate 9/11 properly. They are both guilty of treason.
Vote Dr. Ron Paul for President 2008.
Support indy media.
Last link (before Google Books bends to gov't Will and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0

Posted by Edward Nashton, Jan 16 2007, 4:13PM - Link

It is quite helpful that some on the Democratic side of the table help to make the distinction between true Republicans/Conservatives like Chuck Hagel vs. the neoconservatives that infected our party following Vietnam.

At the end of the day, the only way that we are going to "defeat" neoconservatism is if we can succeed in marginalizing them.

Posted by Marcia, Jan 16 2007, 4:49PM - Link

Condi Rice was just shown on CNN( behind a bouquet of yellow roses) while they announced she had just "won" the agreement of the Saudis for the "Bush" plan.
Why did Checey made a round trip the other day, for tea and a chat?

Posted by Carroll, Jan 16 2007, 9:19PM - Link

"The geographical division of Iraq is inevitabe"

I am still not convinced of that. So, it breaks up...so then the Shiites or the Sunnis both who want to rule "Iraq the country" just just do an Israel and invade the other one to annex it and it keeps on and on.

I dont' get it...no one would be happy with this it seems to me except the Kurds.

Posted by Alex, Jan 17 2007, 4:10AM - Link

Oh, I think it was Saudi Arabia that "ordered" the surge as a means to better defend the Sunnis against the Shia. It is no more complicated than that.

Posted by piero, Jan 17 2007, 3:12PM - Link

americans would never consider a coup right? the people would revolt immediately; the military is too devoted to the maintenance of the interests running this bubble. the system has worked smoothly for such a long time...

Posted by CB, Jan 19 2007, 11:09AM - Link

THE ONLY WAY TO CHANGE THIS WHOLE MESS IS TO IMPEACH BOTH BUSH AND CHENEY OR HAVE THEM RESIGN. THEY WILL NOT LISTEN TO ANYONE (9/11 COMMISSION, MILITARY LEADERS, BAKER/HAMILTON REPORT/RESULTS OF 11/7/06 ELECTION). IT LOOKS NOW LIKE THEY WILL NOT LISTEN TO CONGRESS EITHER. THEREFORE WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO IMPEACH BOTH OF THEM OR HAVE THEM RESIGN.

IT WILL TAKE REPUBLICANS TO MAKE IT HAPPEN JUST LIKE IT DID WITH NIXON.

THE NIGHTMARE CONTINUES ...

Posted by JHM, Jan 20 2007, 4:51PM - Link

Hmmm . . . so there are a handful of prominent Republicans who have not lost touch with reality.

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Privacy Policy - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2010 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.
En ligne pas cher tadalafil 20mg acheter cialis sans ordonnance en France les informations relatives au mode d'action et les effets secondaires. Le jeu en ligne est devenu une industrie millions de dollars avec des joueurs de partout dans le monde des paris sur les jeux de casino en ligne. La gamme exclusive de jeux de casino soutenu par caractéristiques exceptionnelles et des avantages a surpassé le glamour de casinos terrestres. Même les gens qui n'ont jamais été à un casino sur terre, ou joué tout jeu de casino jamais, deviennent attirés par le monde exceptionnel de jeux en ligne. Vous pourriez vous demander ce qui rend le jeu en ligne si populaire, quand il n'y a pas de concessionnaire réel, pas de vraie foule, pas de serveuses glamour et pas de boissons gratuites. Ci-dessous sont cinq raisons fondamentales pour lesquelles un grand nombre de joueurs de casino se dirigent vers les casino en ligne aujourd'hui. Le Casino en ligne contient également un certain nombre de formateurs de jeu pour les jeux les plus populaires de casino en ligne! Vous pouvez jouer gratuitement ici sur le site et recevoir des conseils de stratégie de l'entraîneur sur le chemin. Notre dévotion au jeu en ligne nous met en mesure de vous proposer les meilleures affaires en bonus avec les meilleurs casinos en ligne. Cela signifie plus d'argent dans votre poche. Restez branchés pour les bonus de casino plus rentables et les promotions à venir.