Whacked...? Shouldn't that be "knackered?" In all seriousness, while I read your blog daily, I rarely feel qualified to comment. While I'm here, I'll just say that yours is the best foreign policy blog out there IMHO.

Serge

Serge -- many thanks for the note. "Knackered" would be a good word to describe where I wss last night, but my British-Israeli colleague Daniel Levy, who works really long hours, is always saying "I'm whacked." It's affected my language....so maybe we ae starting something new?

Best -- and thanks for your supportive comment of TWN.

best, Steve Clemons

Anything that brings US practices on foreign territory into alignment with either domestic legal standards or the Geneva Conventions is to be applauded. Small, somewhat late steps in the right direction.

Would this mean that future changes to the AFM would be binding on US personnel? or only the current iteration? Who would adjudicate adherence?

I try to limit my comments to doggy pictures...thank you for the new pics! Your dogs are beautiful!

I still love the dog pics Steve. Thanks for sharing.
About your " rant".... sometimes people make comments that are pointed towards other things that events play on. Hope you are trying to stifle opening your mind.
I enjoy your perspectives but sometimes see things a different way since I am out in tv land.....

Are there puppies in the picture for Annie and Oakely one day? Must have puppies!

..so we simply change how we identify those taken in the GWOT from "Detainee" to something else, declare that the AFM doesn't apply, and we can get back to the waterboarding without delay.

If we can do it with Habeus Corpus, which has been around since the 1200's, we sure can do it with the AFM.

I'm usually one of the silent readers of the blog but for once I thought I would make a comment.

Personally I read Steve's blog because of its Washington content. American decision makers and the 'Washington agenda' matters very much to us living on the other of the Atlantic. Insights into both the people and the issues are invaluable. Germany, France, England and even my country Sweden are today involved in Afghanistan with troops through Nato. And Sweden alone expects to receive around 40000 refuges from Iraq this year. A stabilization of the ME region is vital to Europe. And much of that will be decided by what route a future administration takes.

Not really on topic but and interesting photo essay with some of the iraqi refugees in Sweden.

http://www.viiphoto.com/showstory.php?nID=576

Keep up the good work.

The wonderful dog pictures are a big improvement over apologias for retiring Bush water carriers and Senators who talk a good line but lack the spine to actually vote against Bush. I think that the human race would be better if we lived up to what our dogs think of us.

Ian

The proposed law also will give an opportunity to those in the Administration who authorized and participated in our torture policy to argue they cannot be prosecuted. They could argue that enhanced interrogation techniques were not clearly illegal until this law was passed, and therefore to apply the law to their actions would be illegal under the ex post facto prohibition of the U.S. Constitution.

Why create a legal defense for those buggers when the law is already clear to everyone but John Yoo and those who allegedly relied on his opinions?

The proposed law also will give an opportunity to those in the Administration who authorized and participated in our torture policy to argue they cannot be prosecuted. They could argue that enhanced interrogation techniques were not clearly illegal until this law was passed, and therefore to apply the law to their actions would be illegal under the ex post facto prohibition of the U.S. Constitution.

Why create a legal defense for those buggers when the law is already clear to everyone but John Yoo and those who allegedly relied on his opinions?